Eswatini vs Georgia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Eswatini
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 51.4% against 51.4% in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Georgia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 95th and Georgia ranks 94th of 140 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.0% | 108.8% | 36.9% | Georgia |
| 2010s | 32.6% | 58.6% | 26.1% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 51.4% | 51.4% | 0.0% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Eswatini or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 51.4% against 51.4% in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Eswatini and Georgia?
- 0.0%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Georgia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Eswatini and Georgia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Eswatini ranks 95th and Georgia ranks 94th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.