Fiji vs Luxembourg: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Fiji
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 32.4% against 30.0% in Luxembourg, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 131st and Luxembourg ranks 134th of 140 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.5% | 44.5% | 7.0% | Fiji |
| 2010s | 42.0% | 34.4% | 7.5% | Fiji |
| 2020s | 32.4% | 30.0% | 2.4% | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Fiji or Luxembourg?
- Fiji, at 32.4% against 30.0% in Luxembourg as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Fiji and Luxembourg?
- 2.4%, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Luxembourg?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Fiji and Luxembourg rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Fiji ranks 131st and Luxembourg ranks 134th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.