Grenada vs Malaysia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Grenada
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 38.7% against 38.1% in Grenada, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Malaysia ahead.
Grenada ranks 123rd and Malaysia ranks 121st of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.4% | 45.1% | 16.7% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 32.8% | 31.1% | 1.7% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Grenada or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 38.7% against 38.1% in Grenada as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Grenada and Malaysia?
- 0.6%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Malaysia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Grenada and Malaysia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Grenada ranks 123rd and Malaysia ranks 121st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.