Honduras vs Samoa: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Honduras
- Samoa
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 126.5% against 118.5% in Samoa, a difference of 8.0%.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 14th and Samoa ranks 15th of 140 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.0% | 44.4% | 42.6% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 133.2% | 82.1% | 51.1% | Honduras |
| 2020s | 126.5% | 118.5% | 8.0% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Honduras or Samoa?
- Honduras, at 126.5% against 118.5% in Samoa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Honduras and Samoa?
- 8.0%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Samoa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Honduras and Samoa rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Honduras ranks 14th and Samoa ranks 15th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.