Hong Kong vs Uruguay: Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Hong Kong
58.3%
in 2009
Uruguay
59.8%
in 2020
Hong Kong rank
74th
Uruguay rank
71st
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%) over time
- Hong Kong
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 59.8% against 58.3% in Hong Kong, a difference of 1.5%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 74th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 140 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Hong Kong or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 59.8% against 58.3% in Hong Kong as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Hong Kong and Uruguay?
- 1.5%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2009.
- How do Hong Kong and Uruguay rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Hong Kong ranks 74th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.