Indonesia vs Netherlands: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Indonesia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 68.3% against 65.5% in Netherlands, a difference of 2.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Netherlands ahead.
Indonesia ranks 54th and Netherlands ranks 57th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.7% | 93.1% | 15.4% | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 90.8% | 69.4% | 21.4% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Indonesia or Netherlands?
- Indonesia, at 68.3% against 65.5% in Netherlands as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Indonesia and Netherlands?
- 2.8%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Netherlands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2005.
- How do Indonesia and Netherlands rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Indonesia ranks 54th and Netherlands ranks 57th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.