Korea vs Macao: Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%) over time
- Korea
- Macao
How they compare
Korea currently reports 47.2% against 45.1% in Macao, a difference of 2.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Macao ahead.
Korea ranks 105th and Macao ranks 108th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 43.1% | 77.3% | 34.2% | Macao |
| 2020s | 47.2% | 45.1% | 2.1% | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Korea or Macao?
- Korea, at 47.2% against 45.1% in Macao as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Korea and Macao?
- 2.1%, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Macao?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Korea and Macao rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Korea ranks 105th and Macao ranks 108th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.