Korea vs Nigeria: Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%) over time
- Korea
- Nigeria
How they compare
Korea currently reports 47.2% against 45.9% in Nigeria, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Korea ahead.
Korea ranks 105th and Nigeria ranks 107th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66.6% | 46.7% | 19.9% | Korea |
| 2000s | 110.6% | 65.7% | 44.9% | Korea |
| 2010s | 40.9% | 64.8% | 23.9% | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Korea or Nigeria?
- Korea, at 47.2% against 45.9% in Nigeria as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Korea and Nigeria?
- 1.3%, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Nigeria?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2016.
- How do Korea and Nigeria rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Korea ranks 105th and Nigeria ranks 107th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.