Lesotho vs Tajikistan: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Lesotho
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 63.1% against 62.7% in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 64th and Tajikistan ranks 66th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.6% | 47.8% | 49.8% | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 62.8% | 66.9% | 4.1% | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Lesotho or Tajikistan?
- Lesotho, at 63.1% against 62.7% in Tajikistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Lesotho and Tajikistan?
- 0.4%, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Tajikistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2015.
- How do Lesotho and Tajikistan rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Lesotho ranks 64th and Tajikistan ranks 66th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.