Lesotho vs Uzbekistan: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Lesotho
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 63.7% against 63.1% in Lesotho, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 64th and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.6% | 25.0% | 72.6% | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 59.5% | 53.3% | 6.2% | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 63.1% | 63.7% | 0.6% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Lesotho or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 63.7% against 63.1% in Lesotho as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Lesotho and Uzbekistan?
- 0.6%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Uzbekistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Lesotho and Uzbekistan rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Lesotho ranks 64th and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.