Lithuania vs Oman: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Lithuania
- Oman
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 79.8% against 78.6% in Oman, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Oman ahead.
Lithuania ranks 37th and Oman ranks 39th of 140 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.5% | 72.7% | 30.2% | Oman |
| 2000s | 66.7% | 83.0% | 16.3% | Oman |
| 2010s | 33.3% | 70.1% | 36.8% | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Lithuania or Oman?
- Lithuania, at 79.8% against 78.6% in Oman as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Lithuania and Oman?
- 1.2%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Oman?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2015.
- How do Lithuania and Oman rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Lithuania ranks 37th and Oman ranks 39th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.