Malawi vs Seychelles: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Malawi
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 38.3% against 35.1% in Malawi, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Seychelles ahead.
Malawi ranks 125th and Seychelles ranks 122nd of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.2% | 31.5% | 6.7% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 35.1% | 38.3% | 3.2% | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Malawi or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 38.3% against 35.1% in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Malawi and Seychelles?
- 3.2%, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Seychelles?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Malawi and Seychelles rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Malawi ranks 125th and Seychelles ranks 122nd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.