Maldives vs Norway: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Maldives
- Norway
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 97.0% against 95.1% in Norway, a difference of 1.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 23rd and Norway ranks 24th of 140 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 82.2% | 55.5% | 26.6% | Maldives |
| 2020s | 97.0% | 95.1% | 2.0% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Maldives or Norway?
- Maldives, at 97.0% against 95.1% in Norway as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Maldives and Norway?
- 1.9%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Norway?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Maldives and Norway rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Maldives ranks 23rd and Norway ranks 24th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.