Mauritania vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Mauritania
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 52.8% against 52.5% in Mauritania, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Mauritania ranks 90th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 89th of 140 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Mauritania or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 52.8% against 52.5% in Mauritania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Mauritania and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.3%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2014.
- How do Mauritania and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Mauritania ranks 90th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 89th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.