Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Mauritius
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 61.3% against 60.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mauritius ranks 70th and Sri Lanka ranks 68th of 140 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 45.5% | 57.2% | 11.7% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 60.0% | 61.3% | 1.2% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Mauritius or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 61.3% against 60.0% in Mauritius as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 1.3%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Mauritius ranks 70th and Sri Lanka ranks 68th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.