Republic of Moldova vs Philippines: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 65.9% against 65.5% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 58th and Philippines ranks 56th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Republic of Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.7% | 65.0% | 24.7% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 58.6% | 69.8% | 11.2% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 65.5% | 65.9% | 0.4% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Republic of Moldova or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 65.9% against 65.5% in Republic of Moldova as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Republic of Moldova and Philippines?
- 0.4%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Philippines?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Philippines rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 58th and Philippines ranks 56th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.