Republic of Moldova vs Slovakia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Slovakia
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 65.5% against 64.7% in Slovakia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Slovakia ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 58th and Slovakia ranks 61st of 140 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.8% | 79.6% | 6.2% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 58.6% | 58.2% | 0.4% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2020s | 65.5% | 64.7% | 0.8% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Republic of Moldova or Slovakia?
- Republic of Moldova, at 65.5% against 64.7% in Slovakia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Republic of Moldova and Slovakia?
- 0.8%, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Slovakia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Slovakia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 58th and Slovakia ranks 61st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.