Mozambique vs Qatar: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Mozambique
- Qatar
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 107.8% against 100.1% in Qatar, a difference of 7.7%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Qatar ahead.
Mozambique ranks 19th and Qatar ranks 20th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.9% | 83.8% | 82.0% | Qatar |
| 2010s | 138.2% | 94.3% | 44.0% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Mozambique or Qatar?
- Mozambique, at 107.8% against 100.1% in Qatar as of 2015.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Mozambique and Qatar?
- 7.7%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Qatar?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Mozambique and Qatar rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Mozambique ranks 19th and Qatar ranks 20th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.