Mozambique vs Serbia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Mozambique
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 114.2% against 107.8% in Mozambique, a difference of 6.4%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Serbia ahead.
Mozambique ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 18th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.9% | 148.1% | 146.2% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 138.2% | 119.7% | 18.5% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Mozambique or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 114.2% against 107.8% in Mozambique as of 2015.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Mozambique and Serbia?
- 6.4%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Mozambique and Serbia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Mozambique ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 18th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.