Norway vs Rwanda: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Norway
- Rwanda
How they compare
Norway currently reports 95.1% against 93.7% in Rwanda, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 25th of 140 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.8% | 64.6% | 15.2% | Norway |
| 2010s | 50.5% | 48.5% | 2.0% | Norway |
| 2020s | 95.1% | 93.7% | 1.4% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Norway or Rwanda?
- Norway, at 95.1% against 93.7% in Rwanda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Norway and Rwanda?
- 1.4%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Rwanda?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Norway and Rwanda rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Norway ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 25th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.