Oman vs Russia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Oman
- Russia
How they compare
Oman currently reports 78.6% against 78.0% in Russia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 39th and Russia ranks 41st of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.7% | 58.4% | 14.3% | Oman |
| 2000s | 76.7% | 118.1% | 41.4% | Russia |
| 2010s | 70.1% | 71.2% | 1.1% | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Oman or Russia?
- Oman, at 78.6% against 78.0% in Russia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Oman and Russia?
- 0.6%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Russia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2015.
- How do Oman and Russia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Oman ranks 39th and Russia ranks 41st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.