Peru vs Samoa: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Peru
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 118.5% against 116.2% in Peru, a difference of 2.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 17th and Samoa ranks 15th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 140.6% | 44.4% | 96.2% | Peru |
| 2010s | 105.7% | 82.1% | 23.6% | Peru |
| 2020s | 116.2% | 118.5% | 2.3% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Peru or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 118.5% against 116.2% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Peru and Samoa?
- 2.3%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Samoa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Samoa rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Peru ranks 17th and Samoa ranks 15th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.