Peru vs Serbia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 116.2% against 114.2% in Serbia, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 18th of 140 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 106.5% | 102.2% | 4.3% | Peru |
| 2010s | 128.5% | 119.7% | 8.8% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Peru or Serbia?
- Peru, at 116.2% against 114.2% in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Peru and Serbia?
- 2.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Peru ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 18th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.