Poland vs Yemen: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Poland
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 72.4% against 71.5% in Poland, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Yemen ahead.
Poland ranks 49th and Yemen ranks 48th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.6% | 70.3% | 8.7% | Yemen |
| 2010s | 69.9% | 69.5% | 0.4% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Poland or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 72.4% against 71.5% in Poland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Poland and Yemen?
- 0.9%, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Yemen?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Poland and Yemen rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Poland ranks 49th and Yemen ranks 48th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.