Portugal vs Sierra Leone: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Portugal
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 57.4% against 55.4% in Portugal, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Portugal ranks 81st and Sierra Leone ranks 79th of 140 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.8% | 50.7% | 16.2% | Portugal |
| 2010s | 55.4% | 50.4% | 5.0% | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Portugal or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 57.4% against 55.4% in Portugal as of 2015.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Portugal and Sierra Leone?
- 2.0%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Sierra Leone?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
- How do Portugal and Sierra Leone rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Portugal ranks 81st and Sierra Leone ranks 79th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.