Qatar vs Serbia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Qatar
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 114.2% against 100.1% in Qatar, a difference of 14.1%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 18th of 140 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.8% | 148.1% | 64.2% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 94.3% | 119.7% | 25.4% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Qatar or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 114.2% against 100.1% in Qatar as of 2015.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Qatar and Serbia?
- 14.1%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Qatar and Serbia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Qatar ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 18th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.