Romania vs Slovakia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Romania
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 64.7% against 63.3% in Romania, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Slovakia ahead.
Romania ranks 63rd and Slovakia ranks 61st of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.3% | 79.1% | 35.7% | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 70.3% | 58.2% | 12.1% | Romania |
| 2020s | 63.3% | 64.7% | 1.3% | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Romania or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 64.7% against 63.3% in Romania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Romania and Slovakia?
- 1.4%, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Slovakia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Romania and Slovakia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Romania ranks 63rd and Slovakia ranks 61st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.