Russia vs Türkiye: Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%) over time
- Russia
- Türkiye
How they compare
Russia currently reports 78.0% against 74.9% in Türkiye, a difference of 3.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Türkiye ahead.
Russia ranks 41st and Türkiye ranks 44th of 140 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Russia averaged higher in 3 and Türkiye in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russia | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 58.4% | 53.0% | 5.3% | Russia |
| 2000s | 121.8% | 77.6% | 44.2% | Russia |
| 2010s | 71.5% | 75.3% | 3.9% | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 78.0% | 74.9% | 3.1% | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Russia or Türkiye?
- Russia, at 78.0% against 74.9% in Türkiye as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Russia and Türkiye?
- 3.1%, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Türkiye?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Russia and Türkiye rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Russia ranks 41st and Türkiye ranks 44th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.