Rwanda vs South Sudan: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Rwanda
93.7%
in 2020
South Sudan
90.6%
in 2015
Rwanda rank
25th
South Sudan rank
28th
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Rwanda
- South Sudan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 93.7% against 90.6% in South Sudan, a difference of 3.1%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 25th and South Sudan ranks 28th of 140 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Rwanda or South Sudan?
- Rwanda, at 93.7% against 90.6% in South Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 3.1%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do Rwanda and South Sudan rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Rwanda ranks 25th and South Sudan ranks 28th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.