Slovak Republic vs Uzbekistan: Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%) over time
- Slovak Republic
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 64.7% against 63.7% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
Slovak Republic ranks 61st and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 140 countries.
Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovak Republic | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.8% | 14.7% | 58.1% | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 58.2% | 53.3% | 4.8% | Slovak Republic |
| 2020s | 64.7% | 63.7% | 0.9% | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Slovak Republic or Uzbekistan?
- Slovak Republic, at 64.7% against 63.7% in Uzbekistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Slovak Republic and Uzbekistan?
- 1.0%, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovak Republic and Uzbekistan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Slovak Republic and Uzbekistan rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Slovak Republic ranks 61st and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.