Sri Lanka vs Tajikistan: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Sri Lanka
61.3%
in 2020
Tajikistan
62.7%
in 2015
Sri Lanka rank
68th
Tajikistan rank
66th
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 62.7% against 61.3% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.4%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 68th and Tajikistan ranks 66th of 140 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Sri Lanka or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 62.7% against 61.3% in Sri Lanka as of 2015.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Sri Lanka and Tajikistan?
- 1.4%, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tajikistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tajikistan rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Sri Lanka ranks 68th and Tajikistan ranks 66th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.