Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 61.3% against 59.8% in Uruguay, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 68th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 140 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 57.2% | 55.5% | 1.7% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 61.3% | 59.8% | 1.5% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
- Sri Lanka, at 61.3% against 59.8% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 1.5%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Sri Lanka ranks 68th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.