Latvia vs Malawi: Reserve assets, Currency and deposits
Reserve assets, Currency and deposits over time
- Latvia
- Malawi
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 131.60 million US dollar against 106.76 million US dollar in Malawi, a difference of 24.84 million US dollar.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 135th and Malawi ranks 137th of 156 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 672.07 million US dollar | 153.84 million US dollar | 518.23 million US dollar | Latvia |
| 2010s | 840.02 million US dollar | 479.56 million US dollar | 360.47 million US dollar | Latvia |
| 2020s | 84.71 million US dollar | 291.30 million US dollar | 206.59 million US dollar | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reserve assets, currency and deposits, Latvia or Malawi?
- Latvia, at 131.60 million US dollar against 106.76 million US dollar in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in reserve assets, currency and deposits between Latvia and Malawi?
- 24.84 million US dollar, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malawi?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Malawi rank globally for reserve assets, currency and deposits?
- Latvia ranks 135th and Malawi ranks 137th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Reserve assets, Currency and deposits (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.