Hong Kong, China vs Jordan: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF

Hong Kong, China
930,233 US dollar
in 2023
Jordan
1.52 million US dollar
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
129th
Jordan rank
127th

Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Jordan
020.0M40.0M60.0M198020022024

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 1.52 million US dollar against 930,233 US dollar in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 591,397 US dollar.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.6 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Jordan ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 129th and Jordan ranks 127th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Jordan Difference Ahead
1990s 14.71 million US dollar 5,767 US dollar 14.71 million US dollar Hong Kong, China
2000s 0 US dollar 220,863 US dollar 220,863 US dollar Jordan
2010s 52.22 million US dollar 550,632 US dollar 51.67 million US dollar Hong Kong, China
2020s 9.38 million US dollar 1.16 million US dollar 8.21 million US dollar Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf, Hong Kong, China or Jordan?
Jordan, at 1.52 million US dollar against 930,233 US dollar in Hong Kong, China as of 2024.
What is the difference in reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf between Hong Kong, China and Jordan?
591,397 US dollar, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Jordan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Jordan rank globally for reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf?
Hong Kong, China ranks 129th and Jordan ranks 127th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Jordan: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-reserve-position-in-the-imf-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets/hong-kong-sar-china/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-reserve-position-in-the-imf-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets/hong-kong-sar-china/jordan/">Hong Kong, China vs Jordan: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
166 places, 4,383 data points, 1948–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.