Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF

Hong Kong, China
930,233 US dollar
in 2023
Naoero
888,026 US dollar
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
129th
Naoero rank
130th

Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Naoero
020.0M40.0M60.0M199720102024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 930,233 US dollar against 888,026 US dollar in Naoero, a difference of 42,207 US dollar.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 129th and Naoero ranks 130th of 164 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Naoero Difference Ahead
2010s 49.85 million US dollar 943,516 US dollar 48.90 million US dollar Hong Kong, China
2020s 9.38 million US dollar 938,387 US dollar 8.44 million US dollar Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf, Hong Kong, China or Naoero?
Hong Kong, China, at 930,233 US dollar against 888,026 US dollar in Naoero as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf between Hong Kong, China and Naoero?
42,207 US dollar, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Naoero?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Naoero rank globally for reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf?
Hong Kong, China ranks 129th and Naoero ranks 130th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-reserve-position-in-the-imf-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets/hong-kong-sar-china/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-reserve-position-in-the-imf-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets/hong-kong-sar-china/naoero/">Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
166 places, 4,383 data points, 1948–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.