Hong Kong, China vs Tuvalu: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF

Hong Kong, China
930,233 US dollar
in 2023
Tuvalu
815,735 US dollar
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
129th
Tuvalu rank
131st

Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Tuvalu
020.0M40.0M60.0M199720102023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 930,233 US dollar against 815,735 US dollar in Tuvalu, a difference of 114,498 US dollar.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 129th and Tuvalu ranks 131st of 164 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Tuvalu Difference Ahead
2000s 0 US dollar 0 US dollar 0 US dollar
2010s 52.22 million US dollar 732,669 US dollar 51.49 million US dollar Hong Kong, China
2020s 9.38 million US dollar 837,881 US dollar 8.54 million US dollar Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf, Hong Kong, China or Tuvalu?
Hong Kong, China, at 930,233 US dollar against 815,735 US dollar in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf between Hong Kong, China and Tuvalu?
114,498 US dollar, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Tuvalu?
15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Tuvalu rank globally for reserve assets, reserve position in the imf, adjusted using imf?
Hong Kong, China ranks 129th and Tuvalu ranks 131st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Tuvalu: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-reserve-position-in-the-imf-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets/hong-kong-sar-china/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-reserve-position-in-the-imf-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets/hong-kong-sar-china/tuvalu/">Hong Kong, China vs Tuvalu: Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve assets, Reserve position in the IMF, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
166 places, 4,383 data points, 1948–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.