Argentina vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre

Argentina
0 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo
0 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
180th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
180th

Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Argentina ranks 180th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 180th of 189 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 9.44 units per square kilometre 2.59 units per square kilometre 6.85 units per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 23.27 units per square kilometre 6.99 units per square kilometre 16.28 units per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 26.09 units per square kilometre 1.2 units per square kilometre 24.88 units per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre
2000s 0.0679 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.0679 units per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 54.29 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 54.29 units per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 69.81 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 69.81 units per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre, Argentina or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Argentina, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre between Argentina and Democratic Republic of Congo?
0 units per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Democratic Republic of Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 180th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 180th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/argentina/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/argentina/congo-dem-rep/">Argentina vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.