Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre in Argentina
Argentina: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0 units per square kilometre
World rank
180th
of 189 countries
All-time high
140.91 units per square kilometre
in 2020
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre in Argentina, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre in Argentina stood at 0 units per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre in Argentina peaked at 140.91 units per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Argentina ranks 180th of 189 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre in Argentina, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 6.58 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 35.32 units per square kilometre | +436.6% |
| 1969 | 43.04 units per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1970 | 47.59 units per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1971 | 43.64 units per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1972 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1973 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 5.03 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 62.11 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 74.34 units per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 1980 | 122.48 units per square kilometre | +64.8% |
| 1981 | 101.71 units per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 1982 | 36.68 units per square kilometre | -63.9% |
| 1983 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2002 | 0.0124 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2003 | 0.0347 units per square kilometre | +181.3% |
| 2004 | 0.088 units per square kilometre | +153.2% |
| 2005 | 0.1021 units per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 2006 | 0.1074 units per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2007 | 0.1128 units per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2008 | 0.11 units per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2009 | 0.1119 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2010 | 0.11 units per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2011 | 0.1096 units per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2012 | 0.1098 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2013 | 0.11 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2014 | 0.1035 units per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2015 | 0.099 units per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 2016 | 131.52 units per square kilometre | +132813.5% |
| 2017 | 139.33 units per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2018 | 136.07 units per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2019 | 135.29 units per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2020 | 140.91 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2021 | 138.33 units per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2022 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2023 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
Argentina compared with similar countries
- Argentina's 0 units per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 461.23 units per square kilometre. (58 countries reporting)
- Argentina's 0 units per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 598.35 units per square kilometre. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre in Argentina changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | +132813.5% | 0.099 units per square kilometre | 131.52 units per square kilometre |
| 1968 | +436.6% | 6.58 units per square kilometre | 35.32 units per square kilometre |
| 2003 | +181.3% | 0.0124 units per square kilometre | 0.0347 units per square kilometre |
| 2004 | +153.2% | 0.0347 units per square kilometre | 0.088 units per square kilometre |
| 1972 | -100.0% | 43.64 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre |
| 1975 | -100.0% | 5.03 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.44 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 43.04 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 23.27 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 74.34 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 26.09 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 122.48 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0679 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0.1128 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 54.29 units per square kilometre | 0.099 units per square kilometre | 139.33 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 69.81 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 140.91 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
- 177 Sao Tome and Principe 0.0014 units per square kilometre compare
- 178 Uganda 0.0008 units per square kilometre compare
- 179 North Macedonia 0.0001 units per square kilometre compare
- 180 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 180 Cuba 0 units per square kilometre
- 180 Guyana 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 180 Myanmar 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 180 Romania 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 180 El Salvador 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 180 San Marino 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 180 Somalia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 180 South Sudan 0 units per square kilometre compare
More financial sector data for Argentina
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2022)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2022)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2022)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre in Argentina?
- Reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre in Argentina was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 140.91 units per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Argentina rank for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
- Argentina ranks 180th out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
- Is reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Reserve tranche position, US dollar ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar International Monetary Fund
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.