South Korea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre

South Korea
33,507 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
34,309 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea rank
12th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
11th

Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • South Korea
  • Trinidad and Tobago
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 34,309 units per square kilometre against 33,507 units per square kilometre in South Korea, a difference of 802 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

South Korea ranks 12th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 11th of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 24.7 units per square kilometre 201.43 units per square kilometre 176.73 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 105.85 units per square kilometre 2,966 units per square kilometre 2,861 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 302.49 units per square kilometre 16,023 units per square kilometre 15,721 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 4,498 units per square kilometre 3.33 units per square kilometre 4,495 units per square kilometre South Korea
2000s 5,390 units per square kilometre 15,857 units per square kilometre 10,467 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 13,124 units per square kilometre 27,942 units per square kilometre 14,818 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 34,366 units per square kilometre 33,598 units per square kilometre 768.27 units per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre, South Korea or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 34,309 units per square kilometre against 33,507 units per square kilometre in South Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre between South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago?
802 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
South Korea ranks 12th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 11th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/trinidad-and-tobago/">South Korea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.