Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre was 34,309 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago is 34,309 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.1% on the previous year and down 6.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 37,459 units per square kilometre in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 11th of 189 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 105.26 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 105.26 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 348.93 units per square kilometre | +231.5% |
| 1967 | 350.88 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1968 | 352.83 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1969 | 549.71 units per square kilometre | +55.8% |
| 1970 | 1,283 units per square kilometre | +133.3% |
| 1971 | 1,393 units per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1972 | 1,393 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 2.35 units per square kilometre | -99.8% |
| 1974 | 1,134 units per square kilometre | +48108.8% |
| 1975 | 3,594 units per square kilometre | +217.0% |
| 1976 | 4,020 units per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1977 | 4,158 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1978 | 5,033 units per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 1979 | 7,655 units per square kilometre | +52.1% |
| 1980 | 14,303 units per square kilometre | +86.8% |
| 1981 | 17,099 units per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1982 | 20,703 units per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 1983 | 24,209 units per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 1984 | 24,228 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1985 | 26,632 units per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1986 | 18,400 units per square kilometre | -30.9% |
| 1987 | 14,657 units per square kilometre | -20.3% |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1989 | 2.56 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1990 | 2.77 units per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1991 | 2.79 units per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1992 | 2.68 units per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1993 | 2.41 units per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1994 | 2.6 units per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1995 | 3.3 units per square kilometre | +27.0% |
| 1996 | 4.16 units per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 1997 | 3.9 units per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1998 | 4.39 units per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1999 | 4.28 units per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2000 | 4.07 units per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2001 | 6,018 units per square kilometre | +147893.7% |
| 2002 | 20,238 units per square kilometre | +236.3% |
| 2003 | 37,459 units per square kilometre | +85.1% |
| 2004 | 33,630 units per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2005 | 13,903 units per square kilometre | -58.7% |
| 2006 | 10,090 units per square kilometre | -27.4% |
| 2007 | 6,909 units per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 2008 | 11,914 units per square kilometre | +72.4% |
| 2009 | 18,406 units per square kilometre | +54.5% |
| 2010 | 21,683 units per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 2011 | 31,223 units per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 2012 | 33,145 units per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2013 | 36,813 units per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2014 | 35,198 units per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 2015 | 28,263 units per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2016 | 25,658 units per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 2017 | 18,938 units per square kilometre | -26.2% |
| 2018 | 22,832 units per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 2019 | 25,666 units per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 2020 | 31,505 units per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 2021 | 33,890 units per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2022 | 34,689 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2023 | 34,309 units per square kilometre | -1.1% |
Trinidad and Tobago compared with similar countries
- Trinidad and Tobago's 34,309 units per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 6,829 units per square kilometre, 5.0× the median. (61 countries reporting)
- Trinidad and Tobago's 34,309 units per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 598.35 units per square kilometre, 57.3× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | +147893.7% | 4.07 units per square kilometre | 6,018 units per square kilometre |
| 1974 | +48108.8% | 2.35 units per square kilometre | 1,134 units per square kilometre |
| 2002 | +236.3% | 6,018 units per square kilometre | 20,238 units per square kilometre |
| 1966 | +231.5% | 105.26 units per square kilometre | 348.93 units per square kilometre |
| 1975 | +217.0% | 1,134 units per square kilometre | 3,594 units per square kilometre |
| 1970 | +133.3% | 549.71 units per square kilometre | 1,283 units per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 201.43 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 549.71 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 2,966 units per square kilometre | 2.35 units per square kilometre | 7,655 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 16,023 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 26,632 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.33 units per square kilometre | 2.41 units per square kilometre | 4.39 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 15,857 units per square kilometre | 4.07 units per square kilometre | 37,459 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 27,942 units per square kilometre | 18,938 units per square kilometre | 36,813 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 33,598 units per square kilometre | 31,505 units per square kilometre | 34,689 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
- 8 Nauru 45,679 units per square kilometre compare
- 9 Kuwait 40,252 units per square kilometre compare
- 10 Barbados 39,511 units per square kilometre compare
- 12 South Korea 33,507 units per square kilometre compare
- 13 Israel 32,069 units per square kilometre compare
- 14 Denmark 30,334 units per square kilometre compare
More financial sector data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 4.78 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0062 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 118.45 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate -0.2193 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0046 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 86.49 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 4.78 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0062 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 118.45 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate -0.2193 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago was 34,309 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 37,459 units per square kilometre in 2003.
- What is the lowest reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 11th out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
- Is reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Reserve tranche position, US dollar ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar International Monetary Fund
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.