Nauru vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre

Nauru
45,679 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
34,309 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru rank
8th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
11th

Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Nauru
  • Trinidad and Tobago
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 45,679 units per square kilometre against 34,309 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 11,370 units per square kilometre.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.3 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.

Nauru ranks 8th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 11th of 189 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2010s 47,176 units per square kilometre 23,273 units per square kilometre 23,902 units per square kilometre Nauru
2020s 46,919 units per square kilometre 33,598 units per square kilometre 13,321 units per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre, Nauru or Trinidad and Tobago?
Nauru, at 45,679 units per square kilometre against 34,309 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre between Nauru and Trinidad and Tobago?
11,370 units per square kilometre, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Trinidad and Tobago?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for reserve tranche position, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Nauru ranks 8th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 11th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/naoero/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-tranche-position-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/naoero/trinidad-and-tobago/">Nauru vs Trinidad and Tobago: Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve tranche position, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.