Kenya vs Sweden: Risk premium on lending
Risk premium on lending over time
- Kenya
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1.3% against 1.3% in Kenya, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 70th of 86 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.0% | 2.8% | 1.2% | Kenya |
| 2000s | 8.6% | 1.8% | 6.8% | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk premium on lending, Kenya or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 1.3% against 1.3% in Kenya as of 2006.
- What is the difference in risk premium on lending between Kenya and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sweden?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2006.
- How do Kenya and Sweden rank globally for risk premium on lending?
- Kenya ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 70th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Risk premium on lending (lending rate minus treasury bill rate, %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Risk premium on lending is the interest rate charged by banks on loans to private sector customers minus the "risk free" treasury bill interest rate at which short-term government securities are issued or traded in the market. In some countries this spread may be negative, indicating that the market considers its best corporate clients to be lower risk than the government. The terms and conditions attached to lending rates differ by country, however, limiting their comparability.