Solomon Islands vs Chinese Taipei: Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate

Solomon Islands
2.52 % change on previous year
in 2024
Chinese Taipei
2.98 % change on previous year
in 2025
Solomon Islands rank
135th
Chinese Taipei rank
132nd

Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • Chinese Taipei
0200400600800195119882025

How they compare

Chinese Taipei currently reports 2.98 % change on previous year against 2.52 % change on previous year in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.46 % change on previous year.

That makes Chinese Taipei's figure about 1.2 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Solomon Islands ranks 135th and Chinese Taipei ranks 132nd of 188 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 4 and Chinese Taipei in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
1970s 436.6 % change on previous year 18.78 % change on previous year 417.82 % change on previous year Solomon Islands
1980s 1.35 % change on previous year 44.55 % change on previous year 43.2 % change on previous year Chinese Taipei
1990s 22.03 % change on previous year 3.24 % change on previous year 18.79 % change on previous year Solomon Islands
2000s 18.83 % change on previous year 11.45 % change on previous year 7.38 % change on previous year Solomon Islands
2010s 18.74 % change on previous year 4.59 % change on previous year 14.15 % change on previous year Solomon Islands
2020s 5.01 % change on previous year 5.42 % change on previous year 0.4174 % change on previous year Chinese Taipei

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (gold at market value) (sdr), annual growth rate, Solomon Islands or Chinese Taipei?
Chinese Taipei, at 2.98 % change on previous year against 2.52 % change on previous year in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in total reserves (gold at market value) (sdr), annual growth rate between Solomon Islands and Chinese Taipei?
0.46 % change on previous year, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Chinese Taipei?
47 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2024.
How do Solomon Islands and Chinese Taipei rank globally for total reserves (gold at market value) (sdr), annual growth rate?
Solomon Islands ranks 135th and Chinese Taipei ranks 132nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs Chinese Taipei: Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-gold-at-market-value-sdr-annual-growth-rate-2/solomon-islands/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-gold-at-market-value-sdr-annual-growth-rate-2/solomon-islands/taiwan/">Solomon Islands vs Chinese Taipei: Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 11,160 data points, 1951–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Total reserves (gold at market value) (SDR). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.