Provisions to nonperforming loans in Czechia

Czechia: Provisions to nonperforming loans was 50.4% in 2020. ▼ Falling

Latest (2020)
50.4%
Change on year
down 9.0%
World rank
98th
of 140 countries
All-time high
77.5%
in 2002
All-time low
46.3%
in 2015
Years of data
23
1998–2020

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Czechia, 1998–2020

0204060801998200920201998: 54.3 %1999: 52.1 %2000: 46.8 %2001: 60.3 %2002: 77.5 %2003: 76.7 %2004: 71.2 %2005: 64.5 %2006: 53.6 %2007: 60 %2008: 57.4 %2009: 49.7 %2010: 47.9 %2011: 48.8 %2012: 49.2 %2013: 51.6 %2014: 47.7 %2015: 46.3 %2016: 49.1 %2017: 49.2 %2018: 51.8 %2019: 55.4 %2020: 50.4 %

Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.

Analysis

Czechia recorded 50.4% for provisions to nonperforming loans in 2020.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 9.0% on the previous year and up 5.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, provisions to nonperforming loans in Czechia peaked at 77.5% in 2002 and was at its lowest, 46.3%, in 2015.

Czechia ranks 98th of 140 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 23 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 53.2% 52.1% 54.3% 2
2000s 61.8% 46.8% 77.5% 10
2010s 49.7% 46.3% 55.4% 10
2020s 50.4% 50.4% 50.4% 1

Countries ranked near Czechia

  1. 95 Eswatini 51.4% compare
  2. 96 Germany 51.3% compare
  3. 97 Italy 51.1% compare
  4. 99 Algeria 50.1% compare
  5. 100 Malta 49.7% compare
  6. 101 Brunei Darussalam 49.5% compare

See the full ranking of 140 places →

More financial sector data for Czechia

All data for Czechia →

Frequently asked questions

What is provisions to nonperforming loans in Czechia?
Provisions to nonperforming loans in Czechia was 50.4% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
What is the highest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Czechia?
The highest recorded value was 77.5% in 2002.
What is the lowest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Czechia?
The lowest recorded value was 46.3% in 2015.
How does Czechia rank for provisions to nonperforming loans?
Czechia ranks 98th out of 140 countries with data for 2020.
Is provisions to nonperforming loans rising or falling in Czechia?
Over the last ten years it is up 5.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Czechia data come from?
The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Czechia. Statizoid, drawing on Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/czechia/">Provisions to nonperforming loans in Czechia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Unit
%
Source
Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 2,230 data points, 1998–2020
Last refreshed

Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.