Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Hungary

Hungary: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre was 4,428 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
4,428 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.8%
World rank
41st
of 189 countries
All-time high
7,543 units per square kilometre
in 2003
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Hungary, 1961–2023

02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Hungary is 4,428 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.8% on the previous year and up 252.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Hungary peaked at 7,543 units per square kilometre in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.

Hungary ranks 41st of 189 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Hungary, year by year

Annual values for Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Hungary, 1961 to 2023.
Year units per square kilometre Change
1961 0 units per square kilometre
1962 0 units per square kilometre
1963 0 units per square kilometre
1964 0 units per square kilometre
1965 0 units per square kilometre
1966 0 units per square kilometre
1967 0 units per square kilometre
1968 0 units per square kilometre
1969 0 units per square kilometre
1970 0 units per square kilometre
1971 0 units per square kilometre
1972 0 units per square kilometre
1973 0 units per square kilometre
1974 0 units per square kilometre
1975 0 units per square kilometre
1976 0 units per square kilometre
1977 0 units per square kilometre
1978 0 units per square kilometre
1979 0 units per square kilometre
1980 0 units per square kilometre
1981 0 units per square kilometre
1982 0 units per square kilometre
1983 453.47 units per square kilometre
1984 0 units per square kilometre -100.0%
1985 0 units per square kilometre
1986 0 units per square kilometre
1987 0 units per square kilometre
1988 0 units per square kilometre
1989 0 units per square kilometre
1990 0 units per square kilometre
1991 0 units per square kilometre
1992 858.33 units per square kilometre
1993 857.47 units per square kilometre -0.1%
1994 911.34 units per square kilometre +6.3%
1995 927.97 units per square kilometre +1.8%
1996 897.67 units per square kilometre -3.3%
1997 842.86 units per square kilometre -6.1%
1998 879.63 units per square kilometre +4.4%
1999 2,702 units per square kilometre +207.2%
2000 2,934 units per square kilometre +8.6%
2001 4,515 units per square kilometre +53.9%
2002 6,636 units per square kilometre +47.0%
2003 7,543 units per square kilometre +13.7%
2004 6,000 units per square kilometre -20.5%
2005 2,146 units per square kilometre -64.2%
2006 1,529 units per square kilometre -28.8%
2007 1,264 units per square kilometre -17.3%
2008 1,269 units per square kilometre +0.4%
2009 1,279 units per square kilometre +0.7%
2010 1,256 units per square kilometre -1.8%
2011 1,252 units per square kilometre -0.3%
2012 1,253 units per square kilometre +0.1%
2013 1,256 units per square kilometre +0.2%
2014 1,172 units per square kilometre -6.7%
2015 1,121 units per square kilometre -4.4%
2016 4,408 units per square kilometre +293.1%
2017 4,670 units per square kilometre +5.9%
2018 4,560 units per square kilometre -2.3%
2019 4,534 units per square kilometre -0.6%
2020 4,723 units per square kilometre +4.2%
2021 4,619 units per square kilometre -2.2%
2022 4,392 units per square kilometre -4.9%
2023 4,428 units per square kilometre +0.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 9
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
1980s 45.35 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 453.47 units per square kilometre 10
1990s 887.73 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 2,702 units per square kilometre 10
2000s 3,512 units per square kilometre 1,264 units per square kilometre 7,543 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 2,548 units per square kilometre 1,121 units per square kilometre 4,670 units per square kilometre 10
2020s 4,540 units per square kilometre 4,392 units per square kilometre 4,723 units per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Hungary

  1. 38 Saint Kitts and Nevis 5,069 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 39 Poland 4,817 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 40 Grenada 4,637 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 42 Sweden 4,133 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 43 Malaysia 4,130 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 44 Norway 3,919 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More financial sector data for Hungary

All data for Hungary →

Frequently asked questions

What is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Hungary?
Reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Hungary was 4,428 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Hungary?
The highest recorded value was 7,543 units per square kilometre in 2003.
What is the lowest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Hungary?
The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Hungary rank for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Hungary ranks 41st out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
Is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre rising or falling in Hungary?
Over the last ten years it is up 252.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Hungary data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Hungary. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/hungary/">Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Hungary</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.