Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Poland

Poland: Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre was 4,817 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
4,817 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 2.7%
World rank
39th
of 189 countries
All-time high
4,817 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Poland, 1961–2023

01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

Poland recorded 4,817 units per square kilometre for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.7% on the previous year and up 16.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Poland peaked at 4,817 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.

Poland ranks 39th of 189 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Poland, 1961 to 2023.
Year units per square kilometre Change
1961 0 units per square kilometre
1962 0 units per square kilometre
1963 0 units per square kilometre
1964 0 units per square kilometre
1965 0 units per square kilometre
1966 0 units per square kilometre
1967 0 units per square kilometre
1968 0 units per square kilometre
1969 0 units per square kilometre
1970 0 units per square kilometre
1971 0 units per square kilometre
1972 0 units per square kilometre
1973 0 units per square kilometre
1974 0 units per square kilometre
1975 0 units per square kilometre
1976 0 units per square kilometre
1977 0 units per square kilometre
1978 0 units per square kilometre
1979 0 units per square kilometre
1980 0 units per square kilometre
1981 0 units per square kilometre
1982 0 units per square kilometre
1983 0 units per square kilometre
1984 0 units per square kilometre
1985 0 units per square kilometre
1986 0 units per square kilometre
1987 0 units per square kilometre
1988 0 units per square kilometre
1989 0 units per square kilometre
1990 0 units per square kilometre
1991 0 units per square kilometre
1992 346.25 units per square kilometre
1993 345.87 units per square kilometre -0.1%
1994 367.6 units per square kilometre +6.3%
1995 374.3 units per square kilometre +1.8%
1996 362.08 units per square kilometre -3.3%
1997 339.77 units per square kilometre -6.2%
1998 354.57 units per square kilometre +4.4%
1999 771.89 units per square kilometre +117.7%
2000 732.75 units per square kilometre -5.1%
2001 1,505 units per square kilometre +105.4%
2002 2,126 units per square kilometre +41.2%
2003 2,610 units per square kilometre +22.8%
2004 2,288 units per square kilometre -12.3%
2005 975.95 units per square kilometre -57.3%
2006 571.05 units per square kilometre -41.5%
2007 475.82 units per square kilometre -16.7%
2008 868.05 units per square kilometre +82.4%
2009 1,405 units per square kilometre +61.8%
2010 1,626 units per square kilometre +15.7%
2011 3,791 units per square kilometre +133.2%
2012 4,404 units per square kilometre +16.2%
2013 4,121 units per square kilometre -6.4%
2014 3,158 units per square kilometre -23.4%
2015 2,161 units per square kilometre -31.6%
2016 1,996 units per square kilometre -7.6%
2017 1,729 units per square kilometre -13.4%
2018 2,804 units per square kilometre +62.2%
2019 3,164 units per square kilometre +12.8%
2020 4,512 units per square kilometre +42.6%
2021 4,748 units per square kilometre +5.2%
2022 4,689 units per square kilometre -1.3%
2023 4,817 units per square kilometre +2.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 9
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
1990s 326.23 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 771.89 units per square kilometre 10
2000s 1,356 units per square kilometre 475.82 units per square kilometre 2,610 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 2,895 units per square kilometre 1,626 units per square kilometre 4,404 units per square kilometre 10
2020s 4,691 units per square kilometre 4,512 units per square kilometre 4,817 units per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 36 Tonga 6,404 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 37 Greece 5,985 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 38 Saint Kitts and Nevis 5,069 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 40 Grenada 4,637 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 41 Hungary 4,428 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 42 Sweden 4,133 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More financial sector data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Poland?
Reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre in Poland was 4,817 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 4,817 units per square kilometre in 2023.
What is the lowest reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Poland rank for reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Poland ranks 39th out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
Is reserve position in the imf, us dollar, per square kilometre rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/reserve-position-in-the-imf-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/poland/">Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre in Poland</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.