Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1975–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) stood at 0 units per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 10.6% on the previous year and down 16.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 0 units per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1988.
That places Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) 21st out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 49 years of available data.
Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | -29.2% |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 1978 | 0 units per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1979 | 0 units per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1980 | 0 units per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 1981 | 0 units per square kilometre | -24.6% |
| 1982 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1983 | 0 units per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | -34.9% |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2002 | 0 units per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2003 | 0 units per square kilometre | +28.4% |
| 2004 | 0 units per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | +35.0% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | +45.4% |
| 2010 | 0 units per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 2011 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2012 | 0 units per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2013 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2014 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2015 | 0 units per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 2016 | 0 units per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2017 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 2018 | 0 units per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2019 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2020 | 0 units per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 2021 | 0 units per square kilometre | -25.7% |
| 2022 | 0 units per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 2023 | 0 units per square kilometre | +10.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1980s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 18 Barbados 0.0029 units per square kilometre compare
- 19 Sao Tome and Principe 0.0027 units per square kilometre compare
- 20 Bahrain 0.0019 units per square kilometre compare
- 21 Mauritius 0.0019 units per square kilometre compare
- 22 Cape Verde 0.0017 units per square kilometre compare
- 23 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0015 units per square kilometre compare
- 24 Lebanon 0.0013 units per square kilometre compare
More financial sector data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- Net migration -462,147 (2025)
- Domestic credit to private sector by banks 47.3% (2025)
- Total reserves in months of imports 6.7 (2025)
- Monetary Sector credit to private sector 47.3% (2025)
- Broad money 73.6% (2025)
- Domestic credit to private sector 50.1% (2025)
- Total reserves in months of imports, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Total reserves in months of imports, annual growth rate 3.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Total reserves in months of imports, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Claims on central government, etc. 35.1% (2025)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1988.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 21st out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 49 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Total reserves in months of imports divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Total reserves in months of imports ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Total reserves in months of imports International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Total reserves in months of imports divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.