Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in United States
United States: Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in United States, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in United States stood at 0 units per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 6.7% on the previous year and up 12.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in United States peaked at 0 units per square kilometre in 1980 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 2000.
United States ranks 174th of 177 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in United States, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 units per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1972 | 0 units per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 1973 | 0 units per square kilometre | +30.8% |
| 1974 | 0 units per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1978 | 0 units per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1979 | 0 units per square kilometre | +68.3% |
| 1980 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1981 | 0 units per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 1982 | 0 units per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1983 | 0 units per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | -32.2% |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2002 | 0 units per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 2003 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2004 | 0 units per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | +78.0% |
| 2010 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2011 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2012 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2013 | 0 units per square kilometre | -22.1% |
| 2014 | 0 units per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2015 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2016 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2017 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2018 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 2019 | 0 units per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 2020 | 0 units per square kilometre | +35.5% |
| 2021 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2022 | 0 units per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2023 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.7% |
United States compared with similar countries
- United States's 0 units per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 units per square kilometre, 1% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near United States
- 171 Equatorial Guinea 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 172 Zimbabwe 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 173 South Sudan 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 175 Australia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 176 Canada 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 177 Sudan 0 units per square kilometre compare
More financial sector data for United States
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 17.82 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 89.64 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 12.2 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 65.46 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 17.82 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 89.64 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 12.2 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in United States?
- Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre in United States was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre recorded in United States?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1980.
- What is the lowest total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre recorded in United States?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 2000.
- How does United States rank for total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre?
- United States ranks 174th out of 177 countries with data for 2023.
- Is total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre rising or falling in United States?
- Over the last ten years it is up 12.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this United States data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Total reserves in months of imports, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Total reserves in months of imports divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Total reserves in months of imports ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Total reserves in months of imports International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Total reserves in months of imports divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.