Croatia vs Finland: Bank cost to income ratio
Croatia
51.8%
in 2021
Finland
52.2%
in 2021
Croatia rank
106th
Finland rank
103rd
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Croatia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 52.2% against 51.8% in Croatia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 106th and Finland ranks 103rd of 169 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.2% | 43.4% | 12.8% | Croatia |
| 2010s | 55.1% | 51.7% | 3.4% | Croatia |
| 2020s | 54.9% | 54.6% | 0.3% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Croatia or Finland?
- Finland, at 52.2% against 51.8% in Croatia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Croatia and Finland?
- 0.4%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Finland?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Finland rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Croatia ranks 106th and Finland ranks 103rd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.