Malaysia vs Nepal: Bank cost to income ratio
Malaysia
43.4%
in 2021
Nepal
44.5%
in 2021
Malaysia rank
141st
Nepal rank
139th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Malaysia
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 44.5% against 43.4% in Malaysia, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 141st and Nepal ranks 139th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.1% | 50.1% | 11.0% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 41.9% | 45.0% | 3.1% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 45.2% | 44.2% | 1.0% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Malaysia or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 44.5% against 43.4% in Malaysia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Malaysia and Nepal?
- 1.1%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Nepal?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Malaysia and Nepal rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Malaysia ranks 141st and Nepal ranks 139th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.